Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tep624, post: 1124659, member: 430"] You could make the argument that the sheer purpose of covering this entire disgusting situation up was to maintain the reputation of the program, and the reputation of the program impacts their ability to recruit, which in turn is an advantage on the field. Better personnel is always an advantage. Their motives for doing what they did, to me, aren't much different than SMU's motives for doing what they did. PSU was trying to prevent a black mark on the program which would in turn be a competitive disadvantage in recruiting; SMU was at a competitive disadvantage and decided to start paying recruits to bridge that gap. [/QUOTE]