Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
OT: Penn State to get scholarships back
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="billsin01, post: 757490, member: 837"] Yeah, I shouldn't really knock the guy's reputation, I just tend to be skeptical that way. But what I don't think I quite understand is what the criminal charges have to do with the university's punishment (unless the NCAA cited criminal proceedings as part of it's ruling). My point is, let's take the best view possible of Ped St in this whole scandal. We still know the following is true: -- There was a pedophile running around on campus (sickening, but admittedly it can happen anywhere) -- The suspect's actions were unquestionably brought to the attention of the AD and head coach. -- The university failed to take the allegations to authorities and act in a proactive fashion, an error in judgment (again, I"m being kind here) that caused irreparable harm to many (dozens?) of young, disadvantaged kids. So maybe paterno truly was not in great health and simply made a wrong decision. But any way you slice it the university clearly had lost control of it's football program and, in fact, may have even been on board with the decision to handle the matter quietly in order to preserve the football program's and the university's reputation. In what world is not proactively and aggressively seeking justice on a matter as grave as sexual abuse of already disadvantaged youth not worthy of an extremely heavy-handed punishment? What fact comes to light that makes people feel better about the conduct of the university over the course of a 5, 10 or 20-year period? In what world do we give credit to the university for, after the fact, complying with the requirements set forth in the punishment that was handed down? It just makes no sense. I'm not out to punish the new coach and the current players, but I simply can't think of an example of a program acting in a more self-serving way at the expense of trampling the simple human rights of a group of children. It makes SMU seem laughable in almost every way imaginable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
OT: Penn State to get scholarships back
Top
Bottom