Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OttoMets, post: 974280, member: 716"] I did think that was one of the better comparisons - it's a school for B high school students whose parents have money, has a wacky president who's spend oodles of money and alienated a big chunk of the faculty (way more than Chancy Nancy did), and has name appeal that exceeds its overall quality. Good for the chancellor to aim high, if that's what he's doing. It will prove difficult. SU's better schools and programs are quite good. There are some fundamental weaknesses that affect the university as a whole, however. Many have pedagogical differences with SU's priorities that go beyond Chancy Nancy's preference for the soft sciences. [/QUOTE]