Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="General20, post: 643711, member: 724"]
Man, I love this idea, and would love to be involved depending on what time it is being held.
 
Here is the top of my big board:
 
1) Randal Cunningham - Just brought a dimension to the game nobody else did.  A top 5 passer plus a top rusher.
 
2) Jerry Rice - It just didn't matter if he was covered, he caught it anyway.
 
Big drop after those two - if playing I would probably try to trade into the top 2 if that was allowed. 
 
3) Neal Anderson - When talking Tecmo running backs everybody usually talks about Bo Jackson and Barry Sanders, but I always liked Neal Anderson the best.  In speed he had 63 notch below Barry (69), who was a notch below Bo (75), but he had more hitting power and more catching than those other two, which in my mind made him more versatile and valuable.  For Chicago I actually liked to play him at fullback and get their other fast running back Johnny Baily in the game to start (plus fullbacks had some better receiving patterns in that game). I would move their full back Muster, who could catch, to tight end. 
 
4) Henry Ellard - Remember him?  His stats were almost as good as Jerry Rice's, but he didnt seem to make nearly as many covered catches as Rice always seemed to.
 
5) Drew Hill - Remember him?  The Oilers (remember them?) were loaded on that game.  I always thought of the 49ers, Oliers, Giants, and Bills (in that order) as the Big 4. 
 
On D I loved LT (as everyone must, he was the best defensive player in the game, and Rod Woodson. 
 
But the biggest sleeper in this draft needs to be Gerald Williams, the DT from Pitt.  He was the quickest nose tackle in the game.  You could dive through the middle and sack any QB with less than 19 speed on any play, which means that if you had a great but slow QB like Dan Marino or Phill Sims you had to bench him for a worse back up who was faster.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?