Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="TexanMark, post: 636846, member: 35"]
Ok I never saw your "PP" qualifier...adding that is stupid and disingenuous. Coach P could take very good talent and sometimes acheive at good levels but he has had several 6-7 win seasons and one losing season during his 91-01 run of relevance. By 1998/99 it was becoming apparent he was losing his edge.
 
First: I'm going to recommend a good website for you, I like it better than Wikipedia for some research.
 
[url]http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/bigeast/syracuse/index.php[/url]
 
Second: 2003 you were not in the Big East so I didn't count that...and besides UConn lost to all the decent teams they played. 
 
Bottomline: Cuse has waaaaaaaaaay more relevance yesterday, today and tomorrow in Football compared to UConn. You can twist your stupid argument with ridiculous qualifiers but it doesn't change the fact UConn has never been a better brand and only briefly played FB at a higher level than Cuse while Cuse was at a nadir.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?