Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="cuseinchina, post: 902476, member: 3079"] Ok change that word to allocate. It's essentially like delayed compensation - you know the full amount of the contract but don't get all of it until a certain date. I mean you can call it whatever you want and structure it however you want - but clearly there are serious problems with how things work now. Structuring contracts in a way that enhances likely long-term economic outcomes for players and incentivizes good fiscal behavior (you could give a bonus if they contribute more than mandatory to the trust) is positive for all parties as long as it doesn't harm the value of the overall contract. Assuming it's invested in something that outpaces inflation there is no harm to contract value under what I am describing. [/QUOTE]