Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 37028, member: 652"]
I take its as complement to be compared to the Great RutgersAl(RutgersAl is the ultimate idealist my post was being a realist), but nothing in my post is greatly exaggerated like RutgersAl if you listened to Fishy/NelsonMuntz over on your board you would believe the following. 1. UConn is more valuable than Syracuse 2. The ACC went to SU/Pitt because they couldn't turn UConn or Rutgers (this one is my favorite the ACC thinking we have to get to 14 let's take SU/Pitt because the almighty UConn and Rutgers will turn us down.) 3. UConn brand is more valuable than either Syracuse or Pitt brand. All my post was pointing is 1. No matter what you guys want to believe SU brand > UConn brand, and 2. the ACC didn't contact UConn, instead UConn president Susan Herbst has called the ACC since SU and Pitt left. Case closed as to which school is more valuable. As I said earlier I have no ill will towards UConn, but your fanbase can make outlandish comments at Syracuse all you want, but it doesn't change the fact the Syracuse brand > UConn brand. Kaiser said it earlier if you want the Northeast you need Penn State, Syracuse, Boston College, Pittsburgh well it sounds like the ACC think similar to him as Pitt, BC, and SU are now in the conference. If you want to me post UConn et al, v. Atlantic Coast Conference I would be more than glad too.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?