Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Statesman1, post: 1265194, member: 3507"]
Oh please.  First of all I said Marrone may have "felt" he was not being supported or perhaps even being undermined.  Judging by the anonymous scorched Earth savaging of Marrone in the media after his departure I'd say that is a reasonable indicator of the business methods and treatment St. Doug may have experienced while he was there- which doesn't excuse any potential bad behavior of his own in a relationship that has clearly become toxic.  But since offering an extension to Doug is proof to you he was well supported could you please elaborate on the details of the offer?  Give me some context was it made in good faith or was it a face saving low-ball gesture by ownership?  What specific additional powers did Marrone ask for if any?  Did he want changes in the front office which were refused?  How much/little control over operations did he ask for?  At the end of the day if the status quo had grown unacceptable to St. Doug why would an extension of that status quo be desirable?  Honestly unless you were in the room leave the claims of evidence out of it- all we have are anonymous leaks to the media by both parties with an agenda to protect.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?