Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billsin01, post: 1576902, member: 837"] This -- and I'd add Edsall and Schiano as options too. I know, I know, they're terrible people and even worse coaches and they suck and they should be tarred and feathered and even writing their names is absurd and Edsall had his chance so we should never talk to him again and they're mean and they kick babies. BUT ... at this point getting this program to somewhere around .500 every year would actually be a step forward. Those guys both went to a bunch of bowls. That would be a step forward. They've both won and run programs in the NE. You can add Rhule and Golden as well, I agree. Bottom line, if you agree that this is a really key hire for the university, why are we gambling? Why don't we go with the candidate that has the highest floor and if we get sick of 6 or 7 win seasons (which we will) then we try to hit a home run on the next hire. [/QUOTE]