Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Fjoinkay, post: 215295, member: 604"]
I have no problem with an in-house drug testing program especially since it might prevent a student-athlete from failing a random test administered by the NCAA.  It's a good idea. 
 
But because the NCAA has set no requirement for schools to test themselves and the data about testing at schools that choose to test is unavailable I believe this alleged scandal is ridiculous.  The SU policy according to Yahoo I believe doesn't even require suspension from, school, practices or games for the first offense.  The point being it's up to SU. 
 
And we learn that some of the basketball players failed in-house drug tests 3 or 4 times...ok, over what span of time?  In one year or over the course of 4 or 5 years?  That's relevant information that should be included in this type of reporting.  Not to mention that Yahoo fails to mention any other schools other than Baylor or how many schools have their own drug testing practice and what the policy is for those schools when tests are failed and how those basketball players who failed have been handled over the past 10 or more years.  It goes on and on...
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?