Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Personnel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Wrinkle, post: 3196365, member: 7537"] I'm of the thinking that in the college game, the keys to building a roster that is a threat to any team are relatively simple, and more predicated on mixing the right archetypes than obtaining elite talent. If you can field a team with three solid perimeter playmakers at positions 1-3, you are already on the way to being a dangerous offensive team. And I'm not talking about elite passers and creators -- just guards and wings who can take their man off the dribble and make something happen. At the 2 and 3, really just a guy who can get to the rim and finish and shoot the ball a little bit. When you can threaten this kind of penetration from multiple positions (haha), you become very difficult to consistently defend at the college level. Round out the roster with shooters and athletes, and a single solid big who can finish, defend and rebound. I look back on the Flynn-era teams as a great example of this concept. Those teams were not stocked with elite talent, and nor were they elite teams. But they were pretty goddamn good, and could go toe-to-toe with any opponent on any night. Most mid-majors we see do well in March are like this as well; they surely do not have great talent, but they almost always have a couple no name guards who are simply solid, all-around offensive threats. Usually they have a very workmanlike big man or two who gets the basics done. Just a Big *ick Rick Jackson. We have the shooters right now, in Girard, Buddy and Hughes. And Hughes also is pretty much exactly the sort of solid, multi-faceted offense player I'm discussing here. We don't need world beaters (and we're not getting them, right now), just the right sort of pieces. And this is indeed a failure of recruiting, but just not the sort of failure that most seem to think. We don't need elite talent, we need the staff to identify the right kinds of players. By the way, I think this team can still be good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Personnel
Top
Bottom