Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Niastri, post: 3895968, member: 722"] This is an incredibly stupid argument... If they did the draft straight out of high school, Duke would have had more guys drafted and Syracuse less. Duke does little to get guys drafted, they just successfully recruit guys who will be drafted. Keeping it like it's a scorecard isn't reflective of anything other than respective quality of recruiting. If you only recruit top 30 players, realistically every single guy should get drafted in one of the two rounds. If you want to compare, look at % of top50 players drafted and % of lower ranked recruits drafted. I would get Syracuse does better in both categories. [/QUOTE]