Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 4317763, member: 40"] It's also possible that the other three guards we've been linked to are higher on the staff's recruiting board then Trey. Or a combination of the above, and Trey not being perceived as being a prospect at our level, so they are pursuing other options instead of settling and bringing him in before things play out with higher priority backcourt prospects. Agree that Buddy was not highly rated, but he was the head coach's son. The head coach overruled some of the AC's in terms of who to prioritize in that class, to focus on Buddy. Could have backfired, but as you point out, it worked out. Rautins is another example. Zero-star, if I recall correctly -- but the staff believed that he could play, and as the record shows, they were right. That's why the lack of SU offer seems unusual. [/QUOTE]