Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TheCusian, post: 2616523, member: 2585"] I posted similar numbers after the season. You're right on in that there isn't much change on the surface. But my point is that the goal of our system on O and D - is to score quickly on O and play with a lead, forcing the opponent to dink and dunk down the field to respond. When it works, it works - think Clemson and VaTech. The problem isn't number of plays our defense plays -[B] it's that they are playing a less-aggressive defense while losing.[/B] We haven't seen many games where we have the lead and we're forcing a team to keep up. That's the best case scenario for our D, IMO. I don't know this is 100% the philosophy - but it seems like thats what Babers is after. I'm also 10000% in on depth being a giant issue that has led to late season swoons. [/QUOTE]