Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 1231745, member: 40"] True. But too much is made of that, IMO. Losing recruits one season is a small price to pay for getting a top notch staff in place. Short term pain avoidance landed us with a staff that appears to be subpar. And on top of that, we lost arguably the most important recruit in that class [Zach Allen] anyway. Which outcome is better for the program long term? Hint: don't worry about the recruits for one mediocre class. Take the hit, do what is necessary to get the better staff in place. Wins are how our program is going to get better recruits. And I say this with the caveat recognizing that this staff seems to recruit pretty darn well, even though they aren't winning. [/QUOTE]