Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1607249, member: 1969"] For the record SOS per KP Pitt - 275 Syracuse - 250 The problem with most of these numerical schedule ranking systems is they don't give much extra weight to top 25 or top 50 opponets which are the typically the ore risks for losses. 1) RPI SOS - garbage for the most part Playing team #10 and #300 is considered an easier schedule then two teams around #100. But certainly we know what is more of a challenge for W-L record if you are a top 50 level team. 2) KP - it uses SOS to adjust the efficiency (which is fine), but it can't be use to compare W-L because of the same distribution issue as RPI. [/QUOTE]