Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RF2044, post: 1120371, member: 40"]
To be clear, I'm not disagreeing that Hunt started off poorly.  I've criticized him for that in other threads, too.  But after two early three and outs, he picked it up and the team started moving the ball.  Would that have continued?  Would he have finished the game completing 75% of his passes after only completing 58% the first few drives?  No way of knowing.  But I trust that our offense would have been way more potent with him out there than with a frosh QB who'd never played before.  I believe that with the exception of the first drive of the third quarter, where we scored a TD, we pretty much had three and outs the rest of the game [obviously, we picked up a first down or two, but that's about it].  I'm confident that a Hunt-led offense would have been more effective.
 
Which is why I'm not sweating the OP's conclusion about points scored and what that portends for the rest of the season.  I'm way more worried about our tackling, pass rush, coverage in the secondary, inabilty of WRs to get separation, and health of the OL than I am about Hunt.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?