Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DoctorBombay, post: 4174074, member: 626"] If your implication is: “Had BC been a better team, then…”. Then what? We would’ve lost, or maybe been tested more and won by less, or had more warts exposed in the process of a win? I’m not seeing the point of evaluating our performance by the strengths and/or weaknesses of your opponent. It’s a qualifier that diminishes and downplays the victory, which is after all the point of playing the game, and assigns qualifiers where none are needed. If we’re playing well then a victory over BC has the same worth as a victory over Duke. OTOH- if we’re NOT playing well then a loss vs BC and Duke would still count the same as well. The common denominator is US, not our opponent. JMHO [/QUOTE]