Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="All4SU, post: 4889369, member: 381"] I have to admit, I think your reasoning is valid. However, to bring back the number, the university - as well as the player - should try to consider that perhaps they would not be dividing up the same pie. But rather dividing a larger pie. The University can still sell 44 jerseys with Brown or Davis or Little on the back. While the upsurge of interest and enthusiasm for a new 44 might significantly boost sales of those jerseys as well is the “new” 44. I don’t see why it should be assumed that sales wouldn’t explode if the right players were wearing the number. [/QUOTE]