Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="NJCuse97, post: 2486893, member: 5058"]
Not at all correct or true. These numbers include the cost of tuition. All things entirely equal, and we spend $1 on tape, we are the #1 spending school on women's hockey. If every school in the country only covers that 10 times plus equipment and ice time as their investment into a women's hockey program (made up) then SU's tuition against North Dakota State probably automatically again puts us at #1. If we cut one scholarship from that 10 to reduce spending, we have to cut one from a men's sport. That puts us cutting scholarships on national championship caliber teams (soccer, lax, track?) we saw what reduced scholarships has done to our prestigious hoops team. What if the ice time at SU is more expensive? Whoops, we climb the list again. So we should cut coaching salaries for nationally recognized non-revenue sports? We should save $400k so that the football team can eat better meals in their private dining hall? This is not a shot at the football program from me and it shouldn't be a witch hunt on the non-revenue sports. Football's place at 50 has more to do with what we spend on football vs what others spend on football and nothing to do with how much we spend on non-revenue sports.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?