Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OttoinGrotto, post: 4761465, member: 297"] Agreed. But he overruled the official right on top of the play that you could very clearly see was trying to discern possession, and he signaled us, then the head official signaled Purdue. I don't actually think the head official ever saw Purdue have possession. But that was the call on the field, and there wasn't indisputable evidence to overturn. Had the call been Syracuse and it went to review, it would have stayed Syracuse's ball. The only way that ends up being recovered by Purdue is if the Purdue ball was the ruling on the field that went to review. And that's what happened. [/QUOTE]