Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Ernj, post: 2307939, member: 494"]
[URL='http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0363546516645082']SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research[/URL]

[SIZE=5][B]Conclusion:[/B][/SIZE]
More than 90% of NFL athletes who sustained Lisfranc injuries returned to play in the NFL at a median of 11.1 months from time of injury. Offensive and defensive players experienced a decrease in performance after return from injury that did not reach statistical significance compared with their respective control groups over a similar time period.

Not sure how his mobility was before the injury but there is a chance this will be reduced. Two things he has going for him: 1) he is young (good possibility he will heal quicker) and 2) this research showed a decrease in production but was not statistically significant (this production could just be that the player was older and already on a downward trend production-wise).

And not sure which foot this happened on but wonder if it makes a difference with him being a QB - if back foot, there is more pressure on his foot since this is his plant foot.

Only person i can remember that came out on the positive side of a Lisfranc injury is Leveon Bell.

Can't imagine that such an injury would be good for someone who didn't have any offers going into his senior season. PWO or prep school  might be the route he has to take if he wants to continue playing football.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?