Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tep624, post: 5401185, member: 430"] The irony is that her NIL is actually being used as intended - companies paying her because her likeness is a marketing tool. Many of the others are just regurgitated booster payments under the new model. I get that her athletic performance isn’t necessarily driving the marketing opportunity (say as if you dumped a Caitlin Clark back into college hoops), but the NIL is being provided for the companies to gain from a marketing perspective rather than to influence her to go to a school. [/QUOTE]