Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cheriehoop, post: 1780340, member: 127"] A question that may be dumb.(my normal type) I am excited about the high octane offense that Coach Babers offers but I also liked the aggressive, attacking defense that SU liked to play too. Is there a reason why high energy schemes can't be employed on both sides of the ball? Does playing the new "fast" on offense assume that since the defense will also be generating more plays, they really can't attack as much because they would tire more? Maybe I just don't totally understand. Personally, containment defense to me is boring. Is the goal for us to be fast on offense, tiring opponent's defense then slowing up opponent's offenses and opportunities to score? Does anyone think that maybe with time, after recruiting sufficient depth and conditioning - that Coach Babers could one day institute a hyper aggressive, attacking defense also? Or would that be counter productive with our offense? [/QUOTE]