Honestly, am I the only one who thinks that, given our lack of overall size on defense, a 3-4 might not be bad for us?
I will grant you that I am by no means an expert on defensive schemes, as I'm more of a basketball guy and simply a football fan, and never played football myself, but it seems to me that 3-4 tends to have a lot of "tweener" types who end up rushing from the edge (guys like Mario Williams and DeMarcus Ware in the NFL, and a position that seems like it would have been good for a guy like Brandon Sharpe at SU).
Please correct me, people who know the X's and O's of football better than I do, this is merely my perception that, again, is based on never having played organized football in my life.
Thanks for that, because again, I don't really know the difference in terms of what you need as personnel for a 3-4 as opposed to a 4-3. I'd like to think we have the bodies to make it work, of course, but we shall see if it ever comes to that.Actually in a 3-4 your DL (NT especially) will be larger than normal since they have one less guy taking up space up front and your LBers in the middle tend to be bigger since they have to take on blockers more often in the running game.
In my opinion a 3-4 relies more on personnel which is why it is used more in the NFL and not college where there are few teams with the size and depth to run it.
I think they ran a 3-4 that year, which was installed as he came on board as the DC.Another question is does anybody know what he ran in Cincinnati when he was with Brian Kelly then?
Thanks for that, because again, I don't really know the difference in terms of what you need as personnel for a 3-4 as opposed to a 4-3. I'd like to think we have the bodies to make it work, of course, but we shall see if it ever comes to that.
And we seem to be recruiting to have the flexibility to run both.