Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Millhouse, post: 938565, member: 78"] no i'm not. I'm backing into what the intangible asset would have to be. in this case the value would be intangible benefits. I'm just backing into those numbers. then we'd talk about whether there actually are that much intangible benefits. we might have trouble identifiying what those intangibles are but we can back into the number for a set of assumptions 10% discount, 20% margins. private investor would need 53 million revenue. since the government puts up 80% of the money, there needs to be a .8 multiplier to make the whole thing worth it. if the multiplier is zero, that's where the 265 million comes in. what do you think the multiplier is and what do you think the appropriate discount is? [/QUOTE]