Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="CuyahogaCuse, post: 434424, member: 409"]
You are nothing, if not consistently stubborn. But you are wrong about Stanford. They are better than Oregon. And, your subjective opinions about everything else, including Rutgers, Paul Pasqualoni, B.J. Daniels and the future of the Big East are questionable at best.
 
[LIST]
[*]4-1 vs. Tulane (2-10), Howard (7-4), Arkansas (4-8), Kent State (11-2) and Army (2-9)
[*]2-3 vs. Northwestern (9-3), USC (7-5), Stony Brook (10-3), Minnesota (6-6) and Missouri (5-7)
[/LIST]
 
That's the difference between Syracuse and your second favorite former Big East team. Rutgers will go to a better bowl on the basis of their 4-1 record against that weak slate above. We'll never know how they would have fared against stiffer competition because, like every year, their win total is padded.
 
The Knights lost the chance to claim they are "better" on Thursday night. They failed "prove it on the field" and win the conference outright.
 
You are basing your opinion on Tulane, Howard, Arkansas, Kent State and Army. And that's a pretty shaky foundation on which to form an opinion.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?