Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Millhouse, post: 4825322, member: 78"] I'm throwing out Gerg and Covid. I'm going back to Maloney and I'm only looking at buckets with multiple seasons this SOS is measure is from college football reference, it's scaled to be a measure per game. an sos of 5 is 5 points harder per game than an sos of 0 When SOS is less than 4, winning percentage is 58% When it's >=4, winning percentage is 42% Schedule doesn't explain everything, coaching explains a lot of course Mac had all tough schedules EDIT WRONG Mac's first 4 were hard, last 5 were easy Maloney had all but one Pasqualoni only had one Marrone had none Shafer had none Babers had two (first two) Babers has been soft out of conference so overall the schedules don't look bad but the tough parts of the schedule decimate his teams. Kind of a new problem. But overall schedule strength doesn't explain babers's struggles. [/QUOTE]