Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RF2044, post: 1277529, member: 40"]
Seikaly was 6-11, incredibly athletic, ran like a deer, and went on to have a nice pro career.  He was a little raw offensively, but really put it together during the 1987 NCAA run.   On that note, I just watched a pair of games from the '87 tournament when my dad was in town in December, and it was freaking AMAZING how good offensively Seikaly was in that tournament, despite not ever really showing 1/10th of those moves / offensive potential before that.  He was so good, playing against such good competition, that it was almost like he sold his soul for that NCAA run.  That's how good he was.
 
Etan was a very good player, but he wasn't as good as Seikaly.  He had a much more consistent three year span of contributing at a high level, and he was very good in many respects.  I think that Rak's senior campaign to date is better than Etan was even his senior year, but obviously Etan contributed more, longer.
 
Etan was a really, really, really good shot blocker, though.  I'd fall short of calling him "exceptional," but he was pretty damn good.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?