Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Random Observations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="anomander, post: 2306340, member: 2766"] I can't answer for everyone else, but imo this is a complete overhaul just because they made drastic changes in style on both sides of the ball. Even our best players (Dungey, Ishmael, Zaire, Cordy) aren't exactly great fits for what they are trying to do on their respective sides of the ball. I think this offense will strive with more of a pure pocket passer (say someone like Tommy Devito) and fast, quick WR's. On defense the secondary needed a complete overhaul since they needed to improve the length of the entire defensive backfield outside of Frederick. As for the defensive line they needed to bring in DE's who can generate a pass rush so they don't have to rely on blitzing the LB's (even though that's what the current trio's of LB's strength is). So far, at least on the defensive side of the ball, I am extremely encouraged that they identified the exact type of player that they need to bring in so the defensive can succeed (see Robinson, Martin, and Butler), as well as recruits such as Foster, Coleman and Black. It looks like the changes on the offensive side of the ball are going to come at a slower pace. In order for the offense to succeed they need to be able to run the ball downhill. Between Strickland probably not being the right RB, and the youth of the interior OL (rsSO, rsFR, rsFR, trFR) it's just not happening right now. Combine that with Dungey's inaccuracy on the deep ball since he's more of a DT, than a PP, and we are seeing some struggles. You can't help but looks at the type of skill players Dino currently has either redshirting or committed to realize he is trying to bring in a totally opposite type of player that is currently there. We have what look to be dynamic playmakers at both RB and WR, not to mention the two 4 star O-Lineman. This years class on a per star avg it's right up there with basically everyone not named FSU and Clemson. They are right on par with VT, UNC, NCST, and L'ville. Give Dino time to bring in 3 recruiting classes similar to that and I have no doubt they will be competing with everyone in the ACC.....Which brings me to your other question...expectations. My expectations are to be competitive every time they step on the field. My ultimate, best case scenario, would be to be locked in for a bowl game every year, and average between 7-9 wins a year, with every 5 years they compete for the ACC Atlantic and every 10 years win the conference. If they can play in 5 ACC Championship games in my lifetime (i'm 36) I will die a happy man. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Random Observations
Top
Bottom