Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SoBristol, post: 365028, member: 485"]
Yes, that was random.  
We have some talent, and a few soft spots -- OL can't get much push in a goal line or 3rd and short situation; we have OK talent at RB but several rivals have genuine talent at that key position; we don't get much of a pass rush; our QB is under pressure too often; our MLB tries hard and is just OK -- many teams are much better there.  We don't have a lot of speed.  So, I can't agree that we match up with all the teams remaining on our schedule -- we have to play our best game, with few mistakes, if we want to compete with Louisville, Pitt, Missouri.  We can do that -- I just would be more realistic about what we have.
We aren't a "really young team."  It is a lame excuse.   We have seniors and veterans in a lot of spots; juniors in others; not many frosh in the mix.  Many teams are really young (USC is a good example); we aren't.
If Nassib can get better protection (and Pugh obviously is our best OL when healthy), we should move the ball.  We have a good set of WRs -- a record breaker in Lemon and a very good possession guy in Sales.  Our third receivers (West, Flemming when healthy, Kobena when healthy) are better than we have had.  So, we have a good chance to get those 5 more wins.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?