Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="DeGrozz, post: 1319473, member: 205"]
I read the article quickly by while having lunch, but it sounded like everyone did know about it.  The question I had was what are supervisors supposed to do with the unreported allegations when they receive the info?  I don't think the article said.

It's a really difficult spot to be in though.  As a coach, you are hearing allegations of assault, through the grapevine, with no real evidence being presented, and no victims willing to go on the record about what happened.  Do you suspend a player for that?  It also didn't come out why RS was eventually suspended.  Could it have been the case that Duke did investigate and when they believed they reached a reasonable conclusion they decided to suspend him?  Or maybe one of the victims mustered up the courage to go on the record about what happened?  There are too many holes in the story currently to come to a reasonable conclusion about what happened leading up to the suspension.  After the Bernie fiasco, I try not to jump on the witch hunt bandwagon on day 1 of stories like these.  There'll be plenty of information coming out in the next few weeks to base an opinion on how Duke handled it.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?