RB Savon Huggins to transfer from Rutgers | Syracusefan.com

RB Savon Huggins to transfer from Rutgers

CuseLegacy

Moderator
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
95,914
Like
151,443
NJ Football Spot‏@NJ_FB_SPOT 14m14 minutes ago
Per @SamHellman former St Peter's Prep & Rutgers RB Savon Huggins will transfer for his last year of eligibility.
 
NJ Football Spot ‏@NJ_FB_SPOT 11m11 minutes ago
Huggins will be eligible to play immediately after transferring because he completed his undergrad courses this fall.

No decision on where yet.
 
Four-year starter at running back for head coach Rich Hansen at St. Peter's Prep ... consensus No. 1 recruit in New Jersey ... five-star recruit ... rated the No. 5 player in the nation according to CBS Sports Network recruiting analyst Tom Lemming ... USA Today First Team All-America ... Under Armour All-American ... Gatorade New Jersey Player of the Year.

What went wrong with this kid?
 
He's the perfect counter-argument to those who say you can only win with 4 and 5 star recruits. What if your 5-star recruit turns out to be a dud?
 
I'd take a flyer on him... if we werent stacked at RB in this years class.
 
He's the perfect counter-argument to those who say you can only win with 4 and 5 star recruits. What if your 5-star recruit turns out to be a dud?

Yeah but what are the percentages of a 5 star dud vs a 3 star superstar?

That class had a bunch of really hyped up kids. The WR Caroo is legit, not sure what happened to the other speedy receiver that transferred to Northwestern?
 
Yeah but what are the percentages of a 5 star dud vs a 3 star superstar?

That class had a bunch of really hyped up kids. The WR Caroo is legit, not sure what happened to the other speedy receiver that transferred to Northwestern?
Just saying a 5 star isn't the guarantee people like to think it is.
 
I'm not saying that this is the case with Huggins, but I learned a lesson about football recruiting and the difficult projecting prospects several years ago. Back in the '90s, my high school alma mater [Corcoran] had some loaded teams. One year, they had a group of kids who went to Syracuse, Virginia, NC State, and Penn State. This was a team that Will Allen was on. There was also a highly rated running back on that team named Omari Howard, who committed to Syracuse.

I went to a playoff game in the Dome, where Corcoran obliterated some other NYS playoff team. Corcoran's OL was HUGE, and it seemed like just about every run, the hole would be so big that Howard would already be through the front 7 before anyone even put a hand on him. That is to take nothing away from the kid's ability, mind you, but several times he would get into the secondary and then break long runs. And because he was such a better athlete than most of the kids he was playing against to say nothing of being much faster, even the opposing secondary players couldn't catch him.

I found myself wondering in that game whether it was due to Howard being that great of a RB prospect, or due to the fact that the Corcoran OL was so dominant.

Howard ended up not making it to Syracuse for various reasons, and I think he ended up at a 1AA school [umass maybe?]. If I'm not mistaken, Howard was a four-star recruit, but never really panned out. I don't know much about Huggins other than his recruiting ratings, but I wonder if playing on a powerhouse high school team led to a similar effect.
 
Four-year starter at running back for head coach Rich Hansen at St. Peter's Prep ... consensus No. 1 recruit in New Jersey ... five-star recruit ... rated the No. 5 player in the nation according to CBS Sports Network recruiting analyst Tom Lemming ... USA Today First Team All-America ... Under Armour All-American ... Gatorade New Jersey Player of the Year.

What went wrong with this kid?

he went to Rutgers.
 
Just saying a 5 star isn't the guarantee people like to think it is.

Nobody says it's a guarantee, it's a higher probability that a 5 star will put up better numbers in his career in college than a 2 star player. So proportionally, the more higher rated players you have on your team, the higher the % is that you will be more successful. There are always the exceptions; 4 and 5 star players who don't succeed and teams who don't succeed with highly rated recruiting classes. But statistically it's been proven your chance of success is greater the more star belly sneetches you have (just seeing who's still reading).
 
Nobody says it's a guarantee, it's a higher probability that a 5 star will put up better numbers in his career in college than a 2 star player. So proportionally, the more higher rated players you have on your team, the higher the % is that you will be more successful. There are always the exceptions; 4 and 5 star players who don't succeed and teams who don't succeed with highly rated recruiting classes. But statistically it's been proven your chance of success is greater the more star belly sneetches you have (just seeing who's still reading).
I know about all of that. I also know that the majority of four stars who come here are either high on potential and short on experience, low on grades, or both.
 
He's the perfect counter-argument to those who say you can only win with 4 and 5 star recruits. What if your 5-star recruit turns out to be a dud?

Obviously not every 5 star kid is going to work out. Just like there are those 2 star kids that end up producing like 5 star kids. Those are the outliers. But I don't think it's even a beginning of a counter-argument. The majority of 5 star kids work out just fine, and if a majority of your roster is 4 and 5 star kids, you are sitting pretty.
 
Four-year starter at running back for head coach Rich Hansen at St. Peter's Prep ... consensus No. 1 recruit in New Jersey ... five-star recruit ... rated the No. 5 player in the nation according to CBS Sports Network recruiting analyst Tom Lemming ... USA Today First Team All-America ... Under Armour All-American ... Gatorade New Jersey Player of the Year.

What went wrong with this kid?

At least he graduated. Jason Gwaltney couldn't even manage that.
 
Obviously not every 5 star kid is going to work out. Just like there are those 2 star kids that end up producing like 5 star kids. Those are the outliers. But I don't think it's even a beginning of a counter-argument. The majority of 5 star kids work out just fine, and if a majority of your roster is 4 and 5 star kids, you are sitting pretty.
I disagree. What's Michigan's problem? Why did USC fall off under Lane Kiffin? Texas under Mack Brown by 2013? Why does Notre Dame flirt with success sometimes? What was Pitt's problem under Wanstache? What's the deal with Florida and Miami?

You can have all the talent you want, but coaching and balance and luck and scheme are just as important.
 
I disagree. What's Michigan's problem? Why did USC fall off under Lane Kiffin? Texas under Mack Brown by 2013? Why does Notre Dame flirt with success sometimes? What was Pitt's problem under Wanstache? What's the deal with Florida and Miami?

You can have all the talent you want, but coaching and balance and luck and scheme are just as important.

Like I said their are outliers. I fully believe you need a solid coaching staff first, and foremost. Then it's talent. Just like there are now schools like Duke, and to an extent Michigan St, who have been winning pretty big with relatively unheareled recruiting classes. Plus if you look at some of the examples you listed you could poke holes in some. Like USC was playing with 55 scholarship athletes. Notre Dame actually played in the BCS Championship game 3 years ago. UF only had 1 really bad year, and suffered as many injuries as we did. I will also say that's it's a lot harder to win big with weaker recruiting classes, then it is to lose with highly rated recruiting classes.
 
NJ Football Spot‏@NJ_FB_SPOT 14m14 minutes ago
Per @SamHellman former St Peter's Prep & Rutgers RB Savon Huggins will transfer for his last year of eligibility.

Between Huggins, Savage, and Brandon Coleman, no talented, highly rated skill position kid should ever go to Rutgers. They have been absolutely horrific at developing these types of guys.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,359
Messages
4,886,804
Members
5,996
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
245
Guests online
1,166
Total visitors
1,411


...
Top Bottom