Really?

[Todoubled23]

 

[GooseMutt]

View attachment 107477

How could it not be? Free travel? Why not free food free entertainment. Free clothing cause they re cold?

 

[Todoubled23]

Fits the Bagley situation pretty well given the time frame.

 

[dasher]

yes

 

[two3zone]

Absolutely, an awful violation.

 

[Halfmooncuse]

Absolutely, an awful violation.

Not if they are placed in a non temperature controlled cargo hold

 

[upperdeck]

if you know a kid is a player and give him a ride in a rainstorm its a violation.

 

[reedny]

View attachment 107477

Yes but if you give his dad a job no problemo!

 

[Shark58]

real life answer: depends on the school

 

[W'boro'Cuse315]

real life answer: depends on the school

Always dropping truth bombs, that Shark58.

 

[pearl31]

real life answer: depends on the school

 

[joct]

Some would argue: If the same alumni additionally picks 2 other non-athletes and flies their parents somewhere, then it was a benefit not targeted to athletes, therefore out of the NCAA's wheelhouse.

 

[cuseattle]

The original post made me think back on the early nineties violations.

 

[Janner]

Maybe I am totally out of the loop or its just going over my head right now, but what is this in relation to? The snapshot was from March of 2014 which is stating a random hypothetical? What am I missing here?

 

[Todoubled23]

Ahh

Maybe I am totally out of the loop or its just going over my head right now, but what is this in relation to? The snapshot was from March of 2014 which is stating a random hypothetical? What am I missing here?

Ahh I see, that seems to be the date the guy joined DBR I believe rather than the post itself which is weirdly marked below that.
That forum hurts my damn eyes.