Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Cheriehoop, post: 80950, member: 127"]
You mean the interviews during ESPN's own investigation that they concluded wasn't a story in 2003? Are they saying they were wrong then or wrong now or are they right no matter what they say? So they have identical assertions but suddenly come up with a different conclusion without any further investigation? Hmm. Why didn't they just present the new accuser to the police, ensure they thoroughly investigate the allegations and then publicize the findings? They seem to be contradicting their own ability to get to the bottom of it and thus just decided to take advantage of a story they created by contacting the accuser after the Penn St debacle and saying "what's new"?

They have publically "outed" supposed victims, "outed" an alleged abuser without doing any due dilegence to protect either. They create their own story, then dump it on the police and say "figure it out" all while they publicize the heck out of it and take advantage of the scenario they created. ESPN's role stinks in this entire fiasco whether guilty or innocent. Very different than Penn St I'd say.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?