Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Recruinting Ranking - a 4-yr comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Finwad32, post: 1284667, member: 651"] The title may be misleading, ultimately, I'm comparing different aspects of the 2015 and 2011 recruiting classes. 2011 was Marrone's 3rd recruiting class, 2nd full. Likewise this will be Shafer's 3rd recruiting class, 2nd full. Now here's the disclaimer, we all know reported offers are suspect at times, as are a million other things we can debate. Early commitments and their recruiting process slowing afterwards, bla, bla bla. I deciphered the information the best I could from all the known data represented on TOS's. Basically I wanted to see if there was a significant difference in anything we're doing on the recruiting front. The tale of the tape. Commitments listed: 2015 - 25... 2011 - 26... D-IA offers & P5 Offers. [COLOR=#b30000]2011: 81 & 49[/COLOR] 2015: 120 & 62 National Ranking: [COLOR=#b30000]2011[/COLOR] / 2015 [EMAIL]Riv@ls[/EMAIL]: [COLOR=#b30000]76 [/COLOR]/ 56 $cout: [COLOR=#b30000]51[/COLOR] / 45 24/7: [COLOR=#b30000]60[/COLOR] / 57 E$PN: NA/NA (Only list Top - 40.) Avg. Rating: (E$PN's avg. rating does not include NR players) [COLOR=#b30000]2011[/COLOR] / 2015 [EMAIL]Riv@ls[/EMAIL]: [COLOR=#b30000]2.46[/COLOR] / 2.52 $cout: [COLOR=#b30000]2.5[/COLOR] / 2.77 24/7: .[COLOR=#b30000]806[/COLOR] / .821 E$PN: [COLOR=#b30000]75.21 (8 NR Players)[/COLOR] / 74.04 (2 NR Players) The STAR Debate: [COLOR=#b30000]2011 [/COLOR]/ 2015 [EMAIL]Riv@ls[/EMAIL]: [COLOR=#b30000]12 - 3 Stars : 14 - 2 Stars[/COLOR] / 13 - 3 Stars : 12 - 2 Stars $cout: [COLOR=#b30000]13 - 3 Stars : 13 - 2 Stars[/COLOR] / 1 - 4 Star : 18 - 3 Star : 7 - 2 Star 24/7: [COLOR=#b30000]18 - 3 Star : 8 - 2 Star[/COLOR] / 21 - 3 Star / 4 - 2 Star E$PN:[COLOR=#b30000] 12 - 3 Star : 6 - 2 Star[/COLOR] : 8 - NR / 22 - 3 Star : 1 - 2 Star : 2 - NR Again, million ways to poke holes in the data. And, as many here know, I'm not big on recruiting site rankings. But, I do enjoy the debate and to see how the data is trending. I'm a data guy. This is the best way I know how to quantify it. I think this shows that there is an undeniable increase in the perception of the recruits we're getting. Namely, more individuals who've received more attention on the recruiting trail. I feel like in 2011, even though a large number of that class went on to be significant contributors, were far less heralded. That being said we went head to head with other P5 Programs on 10 of our 26 signees. This year, we went head to head with other P5 Programs on from what I can gather 12 of our 25. Significantly more recruits had multiple D-I offers besides us in 2015 though. In 2011 we were the only reported IA offer for 10 of our signees In 2015 we were the only reported IA offer for 4 of our commitments. There was alot less Akron, Temple and Umass involved along with the MAC this season than there was in 2011. [COLOR=#b30000]One other thing to keep in mind is schools like Connecticut, Cincinnati, South Florida and Temple counted as other BCS offers in 2011 and they did not in 2015. That would've made a significant difference in the outcome.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Recruinting Ranking - a 4-yr comparison
Top
Bottom