Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="laxfan1, post: 4402585, member: 8604"] I don't put too much stock in 4-stars. Feel like those are given to everyone now (do 3 stars even exist anymore?). A better metric is top 10/ top 50 - those are the guys that people have rigorously evaluated. And by that metric, the class is underwhelming as of now. The rest of the ACC is getting top 10 guys and 4-6 top 50. SU has 2 top 50. Same issue last year. Long term success requires a steady stream of alpha's every year. The 22 class is awesome, but since then it's been average. That's the issue - consecutive years of average classes can really have an amplifying effect down the road. [/QUOTE]