Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Recruiting for the zone has killed the fun of watching this team
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Ghost, post: 2864769, member: 581"] I do have to question at some point where we start to reach diminishing returns on our zone. 1. It will always be impactful in the tourney as schools struggle with the length, and are less familiar with it. This allows us to keep games close - and we can make a run. That's nice. We've seen it happen a couple times recently. 2. Recruiting for the zone seems to mean having zero aptitude on offense - which means almost everyone plays us close and they can make a run and we're in for some troublesome games - that likely shouldn't be. Thus, bubble every year. 3. How much do we lose by getting a skilled a PG? A shooter? Is it really so awful that it would completely negate the zone's effectiveness? I would think, especially against crap teams, if we could play faster we would increase possessions, as we increase possessions crap teams are going to lose track of us - just because we have superior talent. This means a better seed perhaps, or at least maybe not being on the bubble. It's so easy to slow us down - when we're not slowing ourselves down that almost any opponent can make a game of it just by minimizing possessions. 4. As more teams can surround the three point arc with shooters - is the zone going to remain as effective? Who knows. We seem to be recruiting so heavily for the zone that we're becoming the most boring team ever created. I do know that. That being said, Battle should be better, and maybe we thought he would be the dynamic 2G we needed for an ISO offense. Howard seemed sort of creative and explosive as a Frosh...not so much any more. I don't know what we're trying to accomplish with our centers and PFs. OB seems to fit the mold of what we want at SF or even workable at PF...but he and Battle, and now Howard all seem to have regressed. I can see where the pieces made some sense - at some point. We just seem unable to adapt, or get anyone to improve. Carey was a good pick-up. It just seems like we're all over the place. I'm not sure what we're doing with recruiting tbh. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
Recruiting for the zone has killed the fun of watching this team
Top
Bottom