Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billsin01, post: 3044484, member: 837"] Agreed ... as long is it is an actual reflection of the talent we're bringing in and not simply a correction based on the fact that we're winning games more consistently. My opinion is that it's the latter. I mean, if someone can offer me some sort of rational explanation for how these sites can reasonably decipher between the 1,238th ranked kid and the 1,729th ranked kid, I'm all ears but I just don't think it's possible. I get that they look at Trevor Larence or Travis Etienne and go 'whoa, that kid's a stud' but I think it's really hard for them to discern, reliably and consistently, the difference between Justin Pugh and Adam Rosner, which for our program in particular, is the difference between 4-8 and 8-4. [/QUOTE]