Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billsin01, post: 3044824, member: 837"] Hey Matt -- I'm confused by what you're saying. Is it because I posted the record with the year the class signed? i realize that not many of the frosh would be impacting that record, but you can also see what the three preceding classes were ranked. So taking 2008 as an example, the four classes that made up that team were ranked 5th, 10th, 10th and 11th. I also think the recruits from the year of the record are in fact on that team b/c they sign in February and play in August/September. I wasn't trying to make the point that the individual recruiting class in 2008 (for example) was solely responsible for the team's record in 2008 if that's where the confusion is. [/QUOTE]