Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billsin01, post: 3045482, member: 837"] I'm telling you -- and my memory has failed me before -- but I followed this stuff like crazy back in the mid-90s and 2000s and it always shocked me but I swear we wound up in the high 20s, 30s and 40s, mostly high 20s/30s. But we only hit top 25 with that 98 class, which wound up being a massive dud ultimately, at least relative to the great classes before that. We clearly had top 25 talent, but we were not recognized that way. [/QUOTE]