Recruitment vs. S+P

[RandomGuy]

Syracuse #1 P5

2018’s CFB teams whose results most differed from recruiting rankings

 

[TheCusian]

Another sign that points to Babers being a great coach

 

[GoSU96]

Syracuse #1 P5

2018’s CFB teams whose results most differed from recruiting rankings

Recruiting rankings, blah, after the obvious blue chippers it's all a crap shoot. Name, trendy teams get puffed up, then 50 teams get their rankings pulled out of a hat, and the rest of G5 are relegated.

BTW S&P gives SU just about, if not the lowest, ranking out there this year at 36.

 

[TheCusian]

Recruiting rankings, blah, after the obvious blue chippers it's all a crap shoot. Name, trendy teams get puffed up, then 50 teams get their rankings pulled out of a hat, and the rest of G5 are relegated.

BTW S&P gives SU just about, if not the lowest, ranking out there this year at 36.

Do you have with how S&P+ is constructed?

 

[nzm136]

Do you have with how S&P+ is constructed?

Well, Rutgers isn’t the last P5 school, so I’m going to go with “a 32 year old man pulls schools out of a 12 year old hat in his mom’s basement while eating pepperoni hot pockets.”

 

[RandomGuy]

Frankly, I thought outperforming your S+P was not only a reflection of good coaching, but also on evaluating talent more accurately than the "expert" services.

I think we're good on both of those fronts, and that's a great thing. We're #1 at it.