Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="TerryD, post: 1106880, member: 3399"]
Jack Swarbrick's comments on Mike & Mike this morning:

* Athletics has nothing to do with the investigation. It's a university matter 
* Nature of the investigation forced us to make a public statement - because of potential of eligibility issues, they needed to be held back from practice 
* Not a matter of a second offense 
* It's not like somebody detected an anomaly on a paper and got pushed aside. That's not how ND works. It started with compliance, got notified to athletic department and moved on to General Counsel 
* Investigation went on for a while before Kelly was informed 
* Nothing in this investigation pointing to a tutor, academic advisor. It's a student to student matter. No evidence of institutional involvement 
* Nothing seen here so far has to do with Brian Kelly or the athletic department involvement 
* Can't characterize the issue going beyond these 4 players. Very confident this is not a larger institutional issue 
* Thousands of emails have been reviewed or read 
* When players were interviewed Friday morning that was the first time they were interviewed (by the assistant provost, and not direct involvement of athletic department) 
* No timetable. Investigation will be done regardless of any athletic concern. Hard to predict timetable 
* Players will not be playing if season starts and investigation is still ongoing
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?