Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="pokercuse08, post: 5594716, member: 6535"]
The ACC should seriously consider changing the tiebreaking procedure to involve CFP ranking. Make the second or third tiebreaker something like "if one team is in the top 25 in CFP ranking and nobody else in the tiebreaker is ranked, the ranked team wins the tiebreaker."

It would avoid disastrous scenarios like the one they had. I wouldn't want to see them dispense with standard tiebreakers if it's like the #17 and #21 teams, because they both have a chance and the conference results should be prioritized. But it was terrible for the conference that Duke got into the ACCCG in the first place, let alone winning it.

There could also be scenarios where it is the difference in one or two teams making the playoff. Imagine UVA was undefeated and a slam dunk to be in, but the rest of the tiebreaker was the same and Miami was on the bubble. Miami getting in and beating UVA would mean two teams. Miami not getting in probably would have meant one.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?