Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Orangezoo, post: 2421887, member: 237"] I knew exactly which article you were pointing to. My point was it still played a role antiquated or not. This was part fact part opinion. Until there is a consensus replacement, it is still part of the equation. This article doesn't change that. Also I don't disagree with it being old and flawed, that was never the point. If you have faith that anything tied to the NCAA could change for the good that quick, I commend you for your faith. Given how they have handled most everything else of late.. I don't share that belief. [/QUOTE]