TheCusian
Living Legend
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2012
- Messages
- 22,797
- Like
- 33,719
Was working through these numbers and thought about looking at our run D and wondering if it would hurt us again. BC is the obvious choice (if Dillon is healthy, but even if he’s not). But instead of just relying on what I’ve seen this year or on reputation, thought it would be worth it to look at the stats.
Bill C. uses the play by play info from all of the games and teams and tracks efficiency and explosiveness (among a lot of other things). He breaks it down a bunch of ways and it’s a good deep dive if you want to go that route, but I decided to keep it simple. It’s also opponent adjusted - so who you played matters - it’s not just “wow, they ran for 400yds” without asking if it’s against anyone good.
Big takeaways: I’m interested to see how we do against UNC. They are crappy, but can run. Like a worse version of PITT. NC State is remarkably bad at running the ball and have survived on Finley’s arm and a good WR corp (despite McF-it). That game looks a whole lot more winnable that I’d thought. If we suck against UNC vs the run, don’t jump ship completely - because it gets a bit easier later in the season.
Syracuse Rushing Defense
Efficiency: #87
Explosiveness: #115
Rushing O of teams we’ve played (yards per rushing attempt vs Syracuse)
Western Michigan (5.4yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #107
Rushing Explosiveness: #17
FSU (2.7yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #120
Rushing Explosiveness: #100
UCONN (4.6yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #96
Rushing Explosiveness: #60
Clemson (5.5yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #19
Rushing Explosiveness: #52
PITT (5.6yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #21
Rushing Explosiveness: #22
Rushing O of teams left on our schedule
UNC
Rushing Efficiency: #44
Rushing Explosiveness: #29
NC State
Rushing Efficiency: #110
Rushing Explosiveness: #120
Wake Forest
Rushing Efficiency: #86
Rushing Explosiveness: #96
Louisville
Rushing Efficiency: #78
Rushing Explosiveness: #93
ND
Rushing Efficiency: #69
Rushing Explosiveness: #53
BC
Rushing Efficiency: #64
Rushing Explosiveness: #28
Bill C. uses the play by play info from all of the games and teams and tracks efficiency and explosiveness (among a lot of other things). He breaks it down a bunch of ways and it’s a good deep dive if you want to go that route, but I decided to keep it simple. It’s also opponent adjusted - so who you played matters - it’s not just “wow, they ran for 400yds” without asking if it’s against anyone good.
Big takeaways: I’m interested to see how we do against UNC. They are crappy, but can run. Like a worse version of PITT. NC State is remarkably bad at running the ball and have survived on Finley’s arm and a good WR corp (despite McF-it). That game looks a whole lot more winnable that I’d thought. If we suck against UNC vs the run, don’t jump ship completely - because it gets a bit easier later in the season.
Syracuse Rushing Defense
Efficiency: #87
Explosiveness: #115
Rushing O of teams we’ve played (yards per rushing attempt vs Syracuse)
Western Michigan (5.4yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #107
Rushing Explosiveness: #17
FSU (2.7yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #120
Rushing Explosiveness: #100
UCONN (4.6yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #96
Rushing Explosiveness: #60
Clemson (5.5yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #19
Rushing Explosiveness: #52
PITT (5.6yds per attempt)
Rushing Efficiency: #21
Rushing Explosiveness: #22
Rushing O of teams left on our schedule
UNC
Rushing Efficiency: #44
Rushing Explosiveness: #29
NC State
Rushing Efficiency: #110
Rushing Explosiveness: #120
Wake Forest
Rushing Efficiency: #86
Rushing Explosiveness: #96
Louisville
Rushing Efficiency: #78
Rushing Explosiveness: #93
ND
Rushing Efficiency: #69
Rushing Explosiveness: #53
BC
Rushing Efficiency: #64
Rushing Explosiveness: #28