Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Brooky03, post: 1769895"]
I'm saying the punishment setting a cap each year makes no sense, which is accurate.  If a civil court case rules that somebody has to pay somebody else a million dollars over 4 years or whatever, you could pay a million right away and be done with it.  Your punishment is served and over with after that point.  It's nonsense to not allow that.  Absolute nonsense.

When we took the APR hit however many years ago, we 'self-imposed' a schollie reduction, effectively 'banking' some of the scholarship sanctions ahead of time.  And if I recall correctly, the NCAA didn't require that the scholarship hit had to be taken for x number of scholarships each year.  It was a set number that we just had to take within some timeframe.  I might be remembering incorrectly, but regardless, requiring a certain number of scholarships to be withheld each year rather than a lump sum to be withheld by the end of some timeframe cannot be construed as anything other than asinine.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?