jgeorge322
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 10,107
- Like
- 17,666
Anyone ever sit in it for football? How are the vantage points?
I'm glad there are folks that see the value in those seats but I don't understand why people are ok with "missing" part of the action. If the viewing experience is occasionally worse than it would be if you were sitting at home watching on TV, then I personally don't see the value. The same goes for all the 100-level.Not sure about 121 but I had 126 row H a couple years ago and for the price of 125 a ticket I thought it was great. Obv it gets harder when they get to other end of the field but from the near 40 and in, I certainly enjoyed it
I'm glad there are folks that see the value in those seats but I don't understand why people are ok with "missing" part of the action. If the viewing experience is occasionally worse than it would be if you were sitting at home watching on TV, then I personally don't see the value. The same goes for all the 100-level.
200s are decent but the madden view is best for playing madden.
300s - sideline - row A thru ZZ - best view on earth.
I'm glad there are folks that see the value in those seats but I don't understand why people are ok with "missing" part of the action. If the viewing experience is occasionally worse than it would be if you were sitting at home watching on TV, then I personally don't see the value. The same goes for all the 100-level.
200s are decent but the madden view is best for playing madden.
300s - sideline - row A thru ZZ - best view on earth.
I think the lack of immersion in the 300s should be less of an issue going forward with attendance trending up. Sat in row Z in 320 for many years and it was fine when people actually showed up. We only moved down when the older members of our group started having knee problems. I really hope the accessibility upgrades try to address this at some point. They really need a barebones third level with escalators/elevators so older folks can get all the way to the top, and plan it so that eventually restrooms and concession spaces can eventually be installed if the funds are available. If they are still considering adding boxes up there for basketball it just makes too much sense.Honestly, i am in 127 this year (other corner) for the first time. I just wanted to try lowers for a change after having always had uppers. I sat 301 RIGHT on the 50 (but waaaaay up) and while it absolutely was a great view, i also sometimes felt very detached from the action and the atmosphere. Wanted to try being more immersed in it this year.
I hear you. We will see how it goes. If I dont like the lower corners, Ill change it up next year.I think the lack of immersion in the 300s should be less of an issue going forward with attendance trending up. Sat in row Z in 320 for many years and it was fine when people actually showed up. We only moved down when the older members of our group started having knee problems. I really hope the accessibility upgrades try to address this at some point. They really need a barebones third level with escalators/elevators so older folks can get all the way to the top, and plan it so that eventually restrooms and concession spaces can eventually be installed if the funds are available. If they are still considering adding boxes up there for basketball it just makes too much sense.
Not sure about 121 but I had 126 row H a couple years ago and for the price of 125 a ticket I thought it was great. Obv it gets harder when they get to other end of the field but from the near 40 and in, I certainly enjoyed it
Thats great feedback. 126 looks like mirror image of 121. I got row T because i thought it would actually be better further up. Hope i can see most of the action. Obviously when the ball is on that half of the field, itll be hard to beat.
I thought about sidelines, 300, way up but i have a fear of heights and get vertigo when looking up, oddly enough.