Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sutomcat, post: 5083958, member: 27"] Agree. In 24-25, we will have at least 4 forwards on the roster, all of whom should be markedly better than any of the forwards on the 2023-24 team. It would be nice to also get a stretch 4 but in this age of free agency, it is not realistic to expect a perfect roster every year. Players have a ton more freedom and are going to find what is best for them. Schools are to have to settle for rosters that are less than ideal. Even schools like Kentucky are having problems putting together a solid roster. Given the current landscape, our situation at forward is vastly improved. If Matt’s biggest concern turns out to be our biggest problem, we should all be thrilled. I am more worried about depth at PG and C personally. The health of Chance is such a big key for this team. If he is good, we are covered at guard and forward. If not, things could get dicey in a hurry. [/QUOTE]