Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JeremyCuse, post: 2657366, member: 43"] I think a 90 second shot clock that re-set to 60 for a save or penalty would have been the way to go. I think a shot clock was definitely needed but 60 seconds isn't a lot of time and as others have noted its clear a lot of teams will go to a zone to try and really frustrate teams Perhaps even 75 seconds would have worked but 60 just seems to short. I would be surprised if they modified the time in two years when the rules committee meets again. As for the dive, you still see a lot of big hits on close in shots some are flagged some aren't, will definitely be interesting to see how the refs call this. Bomberry might lead the league in penalties this year, lol. [/QUOTE]